A battery is a physical strip of spread options on the shape of the power curve. Each day it can buy
one half-hour and sell another, subject to the laws of physics and the economics of wear.
This paper sets out how we forecast that curve, optimise against it and manage risk while we do,
using the same discipline as a derivatives trading desk.
01
The dispatch problem
Every settlement period t we choose a charge rate ct and a discharge rate
dt. Value comes from the spread between the prices we buy and sell at, less the
marginal cost of wearing the asset. Formally, we solve a stochastic mixed-integer programme over
the trading horizon:
Objective: expected trading margin net of degradation
subject to the physics of the asset:
State-of-charge dynamics, energy limits and the no-simultaneous-charge-and-discharge constraint
Here st is state of charge, ηc and ηd are the
charge and discharge efficiencies, P̄ is the grid connection limit and ut is
a binary mode variable. The solution is a schedule that charges into the troughs of the curve and
discharges into its peaks, as in the illustrative day below.
Price (£/MWh) State of charge (%). The optimiser fills the battery in two troughs and empties it into the two peaks.
02
Probabilistic price forecasting
A point forecast is not enough to trade on. What matters is the full distribution of outcomes,
because the value of storage comes from volatility: the wider the distribution, the more the option is worth.
We model the half-hourly price as a mean-reverting jump-diffusion around a fundamentals-driven
seasonal level:
μ(t): fundamental level · θ: speed of mean reversion · σ(t): diffusive volatility · J·dN: scarcity spikes
On top of the structural model sits an ensemble of gradient-boosted and deep sequence models. They are
trained on day-ahead auction clears, the continuous intraday order book, system imbalance prices and
Net Imbalance Volume (NIV). Rather than a single number, each model outputs a set of conditional
quantiles q̂τ, trained by minimising the pinball loss:
Quantile (pinball) loss: penalises under- and over-forecasts asymmetrically for each quantile τ
The quantiles are stitched into thousands of Monte Carlo price paths that respect the correlation between
adjacent half-hours. Our optimiser trades against the whole fan of scenarios, not just its centre line.
5–95% and 25–75% forecast bands, median, with sampled scenario paths. Uncertainty widens with lead time.
Price shape is also highly seasonal. Winter evenings carry the steepest peaks and spring middays the
deepest solar troughs. Our models learn that structure explicitly, and it tells us where the spread will sit.
Illustrative average price by month and hour of day. Dark: cheap. Bright: expensive. The battery lives on the contrast.
03
Weather, demand and the merit order
Prices are set at the margin. Generators are stacked from cheapest to most expensive (the
merit order), and the clearing price is the offer of the last unit needed to meet demand. What
the thermal fleet has to cover is net demand, which is demand left over after weather-driven
renewables and interconnector imports:
D: demand · W: wind · S: solar · I: net imports · Qsupply: the merit-order supply curve
This is why weather is our single most important input. We take ensemble numerical weather prediction
(NWP) runs and convert wind speed at hub height and irradiance into fleet-level generation through
power curves and clear-sky models. When the ensembles agree on a windy, sunny afternoon, net demand
falls through the floor of the stack and so does price. Try it:
Illustrative GB supply stack. More renewables push the stack right, so net demand clears on a cheaper unit. £0/MWh
On the demand side, our short-term load models combine temperature and wind-chill, cloud cover, school
and bank holidays, embedded solar behind the meter, EV charging profiles and the famous British
TV pick-up: the half-time kettle surge that can add hundreds of megawatts in minutes. These
shape the morning and evening ramps, and the ramps are where the money is.
04
Storage monitoring and degradation
Every cycle consumes a little of the battery's life. A trader who ignores this is selling an option
below cost. We stream telemetry from the battery management system covering cell voltages, cell
temperatures, state of charge (SoC) and state of health (SoH). From it we estimate a marginal
degradation cost per MWh of throughput:
Creplace: cost to restore capacity · Emax: usable energy · N: cycle life as a function of depth of discharge and temperature
Cycle depth is measured with rainflow counting on the realised SoC trace, which is the same technique used
for metal fatigue in aerospace. The result is a simple, rigorous gate on every trade. We only cycle when
the round-trip spread clears both the losses and the wear. Deep cycles are disproportionately costly:
Cycle life N(DoD) falls steeply with depth of discharge, so the marginal cost per MWh rises. Illustrative LFP chemistry at 25 °C.
Hence the gate:
The trade condition, per MWh charged
Thermal headroom and SoH also feed back into the optimiser as live constraints. A hot afternoon tightens
the power limit P̄, and an ageing string narrows the usable SoC window. The schedule we trade is
always one the asset can physically deliver.
05
Rolling intrinsic and extrinsic value
Borrowing directly from gas-storage and structured-products desks, we split the value of the asset into two parts:
Intrinsic value is what we could lock in right now by trading the optimal schedule against
today's forward curve. Extrinsic value is the option to change our mind as prices move.
We harvest it with a rolling intrinsic strategy. Every few minutes we re-solve the optimisation
against the latest intraday curve F(k) and trade only the difference from our current position:
Because holding the old position is always feasible, each re-optimisation can only add locked-in value (before transaction costs)
Cumulative locked-in margin ratchets upward with each re-solve, versus the static day-ahead intrinsic value.
The same engine co-optimises across markets: day-ahead auctions, the continuous intraday market, the
Balancing Mechanism and frequency-response services such as Dynamic Containment. Each megawatt is
always committed to its highest risk-adjusted use.
06
Risk management
We run the book the way a bank runs a trading desk. Expected value is maximised subject to a tail-risk
budget expressed as Conditional Value-at-Risk on the day's P&L distribution:
The Rockafellar–Uryasev form: linear, so it sits inside the same optimisation as the dispatch problem
Simulated distribution of daily P&L across scenario paths. The tail beyond VaR95 averages to CVaR95, which is the number we constrain.
Position limits by delivery period and by market, enforced pre-trade.
Imbalance exposure: we never leave the asset unable to meet a traded position, with an SoC reserve held against outages.
Model risk: champion–challenger forecasting, live calibration tests on every quantile and automatic de-risking when forecast skill decays.
Counterparty and collateral: exchange-cleared where possible, with margin modelled under stressed price paths.
07
The trading stack
Signals become a dispatch decision in a single, auditable loop:
Market dataDA · ID order book · NIVWeatherNWP ensemblesDemandLoad & embedded genAsset telemetrySoC · SoH · temp
ForecastingQuantiles & scenarios
OptimiserStochastic MILP + CVaR
ExecutionIntraday · BM · DCDispatchSetpoints to site
08
Built by traders
Spreadwatt is founded by people who have spent their careers in markets: on the trading floors of
leading hedge funds and the world's largest investment banks. We have traded volatility, built
quantitative models that run real capital, and managed risk through stressed markets. We bring that
same rigour to the most interesting commodity in the energy transition: electricity that can be moved through time.
Hedge fund trading
Systematic and discretionary commodities and macro trading, where every position is sized to its edge and its risk.
Global investment banking
Structuring, pricing and hedging complex derivatives on the desks of tier-one banks, under the strictest risk and control frameworks.
Quant research
Stochastic modelling, optimisation and machine learning taken from research all the way into production trading systems.
We're raising our seed round
Back a team that prices flexibility the way the market will.